difference between sandy bridge and ivy bridge

While we won’t know about the power consumption until we actually get to test an IB CPU, the roadmap lists TDPs that are the same as SNB (95W, 65W, 45W, 35W). Ivy Bridge will have enhanced AVX support, the on-die PCI-Express graphics links become version 3.0 instead of SNB’s 2.0, and official memory speed support from the IMC gets bumped to DDR3-1600. The table above summarizes most of the currently known differences. Intel is putting additional resources into their IGP as well, so we expect to see some healthy performance and capability improvements. At the same core counts as SNB, we might see some fairly high clock speeds (>4GHz, anyone?) since current quad-core Sandy Bridge CPUs already offer Turbo Boost up to 3.8GHz, and adding additional cache to the design is almost a given.

Unfortunately, we don’t have any information on core counts, clock speeds, model numbers, cache sizes, or the IGP. That will bring lower power consumption and thus less heat while keeping the same performance level. That means the micro-architecture is mostly the same as Sandy Bridge, but it will be manufactured using 22nm process instead of 32nm. Ivy Bridge will be a die shrink of Sandy Bridge and represents a “tick” in Intel’s product line. Intel still isn’t taking the wraps off of their Ivy Bridge architecture, but yesterday’s 3D Tri-Gate announcement certainly changes the expectations. Today, we have a lot of interesting news about other Intel products, including a look at the Ivy Bridge platform and upcoming SSDs. Last week, we told you about Sandy Bridge-E and X79 chipset.

Difference between sandy bridge and ivy bridge